Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:35
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Charting the Global Economy: US GDP Falls on Larger Trade Hit - Bloomberg
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
OpenAI claims to have hit $10B in annual revenue - TechCrunch
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Steelers sign Aaron Rodgers, pending a physical - NBC Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Insulin Isn't Just Made by The Pancreas. Here's Another Location Few Know About. - ScienceAlert
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
'Brady Bunch' Star Mourns Terrible Loss: 'My Heart is Broken' - Yahoo
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.